PeptidePedia The community reference

Beyond-use date: difference between revisions

Diff·revision 24 → 25·22:47, 11 Oct 2025

Difference between revision 24 and revision 25 of Beyond-use date. 5 lines changed; the page grew by 676 bytes.

Revision 24 — 00:54, 19 Sep 2025
StubSorterBot (talk)
bot: normalise unit spacing
20,489 bytes +1,459
Revision 25 — 22:47, 11 Oct 2025
ForestPlotFinn (talk)
alphabetise the see-also list
21,165 bytes +676
126* what the preparation is, at what concentration, in enough detail to identify the applicable default.126* what the preparation is, at what concentration, in enough detail to identify the applicable default.
127127
+128For an opened manufactured container the equivalent record is the date of first entry, annotated on the container. Guidance treats an unannotated multiple-dose container as undatable and therefore to be discarded, on the ground that no evidence exists that it is within its period.{{r|usp797,cdc_injection_bud}}
+129
128== Terminology and the conflation problem ==130== Terminology and the conflation problem ==
129The two kinds of date are conflated pervasively, and the conflation is not merely pedantic to correct, because the two respond differently to the questions readers ask.131The two kinds of date are conflated pervasively, and the conflation is not merely pedantic to correct, because the two respond differently to the questions readers ask.
133Asked what happens on the day after, the answers differ. Passing an expiration date means the manufacturer's assurance of conformance to specification has ended; the product is very often still within specification, and stability studies extending past labelled shelf life routinely show that. Passing a beyond-use date on a preserved multiple-dose container means a microbiological risk bound has been exceeded, which is a different kind of statement and not one about assay values.{{r|usp1191,usp51}}135Asked what happens on the day after, the answers differ. Passing an expiration date means the manufacturer's assurance of conformance to specification has ended; the product is very often still within specification, and stability studies extending past labelled shelf life routinely show that. Passing a beyond-use date on a preserved multiple-dose container means a microbiological risk bound has been exceeded, which is a different kind of statement and not one about assay values.{{r|usp1191,usp51}}
134136
+137Asked whether refrigeration helps, the answers differ, as set out in §Definition and contrast with the expiration date.
+138
135== References ==139== References ==
136{{reflist}}140{{reflist}}
142<ref name="ich_q1a">International Council for Harmonisation, ''Q1A(R2): Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products'' (2003), read with ''Q1E: Evaluation for Stability Data'' (2003).</ref>146<ref name="ich_q1a">International Council for Harmonisation, ''Q1A(R2): Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products'' (2003), read with ''Q1E: Evaluation for Stability Data'' (2003).</ref>
143<ref name="trissel2022">Trissel LA. ''Handbook on Injectable Drugs''. 21st edition, American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (2022). The standard compilation of published stability and compatibility data.</ref>147<ref name="trissel2022">Trissel LA. ''Handbook on Injectable Drugs''. 21st edition, American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (2022). The standard compilation of published stability and compatibility data.</ref>
+148<ref name="cdc_injection_bud">Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ''Guide to Infection Prevention for Outpatient Settings: Minimum Expectations for Safe Care'', with associated injection-safety guidance on dating opened vials.</ref>
144<ref name="ppbud">PeptidePedia community dating-practice tally and the 2026 request for comment on dating terminology (self-reported practice; weak evidence — see [[Project:Sourcing_guidelines]]).</ref>149<ref name="ppbud">PeptidePedia community dating-practice tally and the 2026 request for comment on dating terminology (self-reported practice; weak evidence — see [[Project:Sourcing_guidelines]]).</ref>
145150