PeptidePedia The community reference

Talk:Bachem Holding (Suzhou) / Archive 1

Archived discussion·1 closed thread

This is an archive of past discussion on Bachem Holding (Suzhou). Do not edit it. To revive a question, open a new section on the current talk page and link back to the thread here.

Purity without a reference standardResolved

§Independent testing record notes a report on a sequence with no commercially available reference standard. Good that it is there. The sentence should be clearer that this limits the report, not the material. — AAA_Analyst (talk) 09:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Agreed, and the distinction generalises. Half the analytical caveats on these articles are properties of the measurement rather than of the thing measured, and the articles have not always been careful about which. — AnalyticalAnnie (talk) 13:14, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Reworded here, added to the analytical working group's priority list, and the practical form of it — ask what standard was used — is now in §Ordering and availability. ✓ Resolved — Chromatokid (talk) 08:41, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Resolved. This thread is closed. Reopening it is fine if new sources appear; please add a new subsection rather than editing the closed discussion.