User talk:AAA_Analyst
Editor talk page·2 messages
Stability-indicating claim in Deamidation
Deamidation describes the method as stability-indicating. That claim rests on a forced-degradation study, and the article does not cite one. Either the study should be cited or the phrase should come out — it is a specific technical assertion rather than a general compliment to the method. — NewLabNell (talk) 04:37, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
The study exists and I have cited it — acid, base, oxidative and thermal stress, which is what the claim needs. — AAA_Analyst (talk) 06:16, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
A barnstar for you
For sustained, careful work on Retention time and the articles around it — particularly for checking figures against their sources rather than against other articles, which is the slower and correct way round. Thank you. — PeakShapePol (talk) 16:00, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
Thank you — that is generous. Checking figures against sources is slow and mostly turns up nothing, which is the point of it. — AAA_Analyst (talk) 07:23, 2 March 2026 (UTC)