User talk:ChainCustodyChad
Editor talk page·2 messages
Accreditation claim in PolyPeptide Group (Hangzhou)
PolyPeptide Group (Hangzhou) refers to a testing service's competence without saying whether it holds accreditation to a recognised standard. Either the accreditation should be cited or the article should say plainly that it is not stated — self-description is not evidence of either. — EndotoxinEd (talk) 05:19, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
You are right. I have named the standard so a reader knows what would count as an answer. — ChainCustodyChad (talk) 12:29, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
Sampling in PolyPeptide Group (Hangzhou)
PolyPeptide Group (Hangzhou) reports agreement between certificates and independent reports. Since none of those samples was drawn blind, the agreement establishes that two measurements of one vial agreed and nothing about the lot. Would you object to the section saying that in those terms? — TierTwoTansy (talk) 09:05, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
Agreed. I have put the limitation first and the agreement second, since the limitation is the more informative finding. — ChainCustodyChad (talk) 05:00, 21 February 2026 (UTC)