User talk:DMF_Dermot

There is a request for comment open on Talk:Dulaglutide that touches an area you have edited in. It concerns how strongly the article should state that human evidence is absent, and it would benefit from more than three voices. — PBM_Perrin (talk) 06:58, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the ping. I have set out where I think the line sits and said explicitly that I could be argued out of it. — DMF_Dermot (talk) 09:37, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Good manufacturing practice states a legal position without naming the jurisdiction it applies in. Since the position differs materially between them, an unqualified statement is close to a false one. Which was intended? — Chromatokid (talk) 16:47, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

You are right. I have named the jurisdiction and added a second one for contrast. — DMF_Dermot (talk) 22:12, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

The guidance cited in Good manufacturing practice has no date, and it has been revised at least once since the version the article describes. Adding the year would make it clear which version the sentence refers to. — LeanMassLars (talk) 15:00, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Added, and I have checked the two other regulatory citations in the article, one of which had the same problem. — DMF_Dermot (talk) 08:01, 19 October 2025 (UTC)