User talk:DiluentDiya
Editor talk page·2 messages
Stability-indicating claim in Analytical method validation
Analytical method validation describes the method as stability-indicating. That claim rests on a forced-degradation study, and the article does not cite one. Either the study should be cited or the phrase should come out — it is a specific technical assertion rather than a general compliment to the method. — PeakShapePol (talk) 08:16, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
Agreed. I have removed the phrase and described what the method actually separates, which is more useful anyway. — DiluentDiya (talk) 14:58, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
Stability-indicating claim in Analytical method validation
Analytical method validation describes the method as stability-indicating. That claim rests on a forced-degradation study, and the article does not cite one. Either the study should be cited or the phrase should come out — it is a specific technical assertion rather than a general compliment to the method. — SigFigSindri (talk) 03:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
You are right. There is no forced-degradation study cited and the phrase has come out. — DiluentDiya (talk) 23:08, 2 June 2026 (UTC)