User talk:ShortageShona

The guidance cited in Good manufacturing practice has no date, and it has been revised at least once since the version the article describes. Adding the year would make it clear which version the sentence refers to. — DefinedTermDov (talk) 14:04, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

You are right. Undated guidance is close to unciteable. Fixed. — ShortageShona (talk) 02:40, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

The {{cn}} tags on Patent expiry and biosimilars have all been addressed, so I have removed the article-level banner. Thank you for working through them — that backlog had been open since last autumn. — BiosimilarBoaz (talk) 17:52, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for removing the banner rather than leaving it to rot. A stale maintenance tag teaches readers to ignore them. — ShortageShona (talk) 11:36, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Two sentences in ISO 9001 tell a reader what to do about importation. This wiki describes the legal position and does not advise on it — the distinction is in Project:Medical disclaimer and it matters more here than almost anywhere. I have rewritten both descriptively. — GreyMarketGreer (talk) 20:28, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

Fair. I have checked the rest of the article and found one more sentence in the imperative. — ShortageShona (talk) 21:36, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

Regulatory status by jurisdiction states a legal position without naming the jurisdiction it applies in. Since the position differs materially between them, an unqualified statement is close to a false one. Which was intended? — FiveOhThreeB (talk) 14:40, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. The position I described applies in one jurisdiction only and the article now says which. — ShortageShona (talk) 07:25, 18 January 2026 (UTC)