User talk:SurpassSunniva
Editor talk page·2 messages
Analysis population in STEP trial programme
STEP trial programme gives the primary result without saying whether it is intention-to-treat or per-protocol. For a trial with this much discontinuation the two differ materially. Does the publication state it, or is it in the statistical analysis plan? — Chromatokid (talk) 06:29, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
It is in the statistical analysis plan rather than the paper. I have cited the plan and named the population. — SurpassSunniva (talk) 01:59, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Cross-trial comparison in STEP trial programme
The paragraph in STEP trial programme setting two trials' results against each other reads as a head-to-head finding, which it is not — different populations, different durations, different endpoints. I have labelled it as a cross-trial comparison rather than removing it, but it may be better out. — PreregPriya (talk) 01:30, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
Fair. The label is enough for me; a reader who reaches that paragraph now knows what they are looking at. — SurpassSunniva (talk) 21:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC)