User talk:HyphenHarriet

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 and Electrospray ionisation now use the same units, the same date format and the same abbreviations at first use, which they did not a fortnight ago. That kind of work is invisible unless somebody reads the two articles together, which is exactly what readers here do. — EscalationEira (talk) 23:17, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

Appreciated. There are two more in the same group that I have not reached yet. — HyphenHarriet (talk) 04:39, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

A move has been proposed at Talk:Incretin effect. Since you wrote most of the article's current text you may have a view on whether the proposed title is the one a reader would search for. — GsCouplingGil (talk) 15:26, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

I have suggested a third title that neither side proposed, which may be worse than both but is at least unambiguous. — HyphenHarriet (talk) 07:11, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

You removed a sourced paragraph from Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 without an edit summary. I have restored it. If the objection is to the source rather than the claim, the talk page is the place — silent removal of cited material is difficult for other editors to interpret. — EmptyingElke (talk) 08:11, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

You are right that silent removal is unreadable to other editors. I have opened a section setting out the objection. — HyphenHarriet (talk) 13:48, 26 December 2025 (UTC)