User talk:PancreasPru

We have now reverted each other twice on Crude peptide, which is a sign that the disagreement is substantive rather than accidental. My reading is that the source supports the weaker of the two claims. Rather than continue in edit summaries, shall we put it on the article talk page and let someone else weigh in? — CustomsClarke (talk) 01:49, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Agreed, and thank you for stopping. I have set out my reading on the talk page and will not edit the sentence again meanwhile. — PancreasPru (talk) 19:06, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

The sentence you added to Hypoglycaemia draws a human conclusion from an animal study. That is the specific case Project:No original research is aimed at. Describing the study, its model and the absence of human data is both permitted and, I would argue, more informative than the inference. — BiliaryBea (talk) 19:44, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Agreed. The sentence now says what was measured, in what species, and that no human data exists. — PancreasPru (talk) 08:14, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

The diagram you added to Hypoglycaemia is much clearer than the paragraph it replaced, and it is correctly labelled, which is rarer than it should be. If you have the patience for more of them, Special:WantedPages is not the right list but the portals each keep a "things you can do" box, and several ask for figures. — ChainCustodyChad (talk) 11:44, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

Appreciated. If there is a house palette I should be using, point me at it and I will redo the two I have done. — PancreasPru (talk) 15:27, 30 May 2026 (UTC)