User talk:Hedgerow_Hal

You added the mass-balance table to Hubei Jianxiang Bioscience. Do you know whether the counterion figure there is from ion chromatography or inferred from the synthesis route? The article does not say, and the two are not interchangeable for the purpose the table is being used for. — UnderfillUna (talk) 07:43, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

The figure is measured, by ion chromatography. I have added the method, because you are right that the two are not interchangeable. — Hedgerow_Hal (talk) 18:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

In Baseline laboratory panel you added an incidence figure without its comparator rate. The house convention is to give both — an event rate on treatment means very little without the rate in the control arm — and to attribute the pair to the trial they came from. Would you be able to add the placebo rate and the citation? — ApoB_Aurelio (talk) 14:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Agreed. I have added the placebo rate and attributed the pair to the trial they came from. — Hedgerow_Hal (talk) 06:15, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

★ Awarded for the work on Insulin syringe unit conversion and Zhuhai Kerui Biotechnology. Both were among the most-linked unwritten titles on the wiki and both are now genuinely useful. Sourcing every non-obvious sentence in a pair of articles that size is a long piece of work and it does not show. — TSH_Tallulah (talk) 14:02, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. The second article was the harder one — most of the literature on it is a decade old and not open access. — Hedgerow_Hal (talk) 09:38, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Your recent edits to Hubei Jianxiang Bioscience have consistently favoured one organisation, and one of them added promotional wording. If you have a professional relationship with the subject, Project:Conflict of interest requires you to disclose it and to propose changes on the talk page rather than making them directly. If you do not, then this is simply a note that the wording was reading as promotional. — ForgeryFinder (talk) 03:39, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

None to disclose. I edit that article often because it is on my watchlist and it attracts more promotional editing than most. — Hedgerow_Hal (talk) 16:48, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

I have added {{refimprove}} to Insulin syringe unit conversion. Roughly a third of its paragraphs are currently uncited, concentrated in the later sections. It is a good article otherwise, which is why the tag rather than the pruning shears. — TalkPageTaro (talk) 13:21, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Agreed, and thank you for the tag rather than the cut. I will work through the later sections this month. — Hedgerow_Hal (talk) 22:24, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Peptide stability table and Loss on drying now use the same units, the same date format and the same abbreviations at first use, which they did not a fortnight ago. That kind of work is invisible unless somebody reads the two articles together, which is exactly what readers here do. — Retention_Time_Rae (talk) 04:05, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. Reading them side by side is what made the inconsistencies visible in the first place. — Hedgerow_Hal (talk) 07:50, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Insulin syringe unit conversion and Baseline laboratory panel now use the same units, the same date format and the same abbreviations at first use, which they did not a fortnight ago. That kind of work is invisible unless somebody reads the two articles together, which is exactly what readers here do. — GHK_Gwendolen (talk) 17:02, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Appreciated. There are two more in the same group that I have not reached yet. — Hedgerow_Hal (talk) 04:59, 8 March 2026 (UTC)